From the development of the mining to the construction of the processing factory.
Mining & mineral-processing project management system
Extracted tonnage, plant feed and saleable product are different measures. Without clear transfers, inventories and measurement rules, production and cost reports can contradict each other.
A common data model.From Operations to Management Report.
Experience the process.
Control must be testable.
This example shows how incomplete evidence or incomplete authority stops the gateway passing. No number of performance or customer history is claimed in this image.
Process labCOST / EAC
Sample record
SHIFT-M04 / Shift performance
Held at control gate
Evidence complete1 / 3
Gate statusOpen constraint
Baseline revisionUnchanged
Record & history Decision gateThe animation illustrates a process; it does not transfer live data.
1BudgetProject Manager / Finance
2Really received.The owner and the money.
3The Open Commitment.Buying / Contracting
4The ETCThe owner closed.
5The EACThe Cost Control Manager.
Decision audit trail
Missing prerequisites or insufficient authority prevent release through the gate.
Interactive example with illustrative data and local browser state; not a customer dashboard or real authorization. Access controls for a commissioned system must be enforced on the server.
Testable design / no list of possibilities
Trace mining operations from shift records to reliable outputs
The mining and processing model must be designed in accordance with the type of mining and measurement unit. the data of the basket, sampling and shifting without matching, is not a certain basis for productivity.
Question of decision.
Is the decrease in production caused by front access, machine stop, food quality or resource allocation?
At least the information model.
Shift and Front.
Date, scope, type of operation, supervisor and valid purpose.
Install and stop.
Car, working hours, ready to work, scheduled stops and disruptions; with cause.
Output and consumption
Competition, source of measurement, quality, fuel and related costs.
Design controls.
Time of Shift.
Working hours, stops and out of the program must be compatible with the shift length.
Quantity reconciliation
Production, transportation and packaging are matched with the cargo ID; the competition is estimated to have an independent label.
Comparison is reliable.
The productivity of the fronts with the land conditions, the type of material and the distances of transport are not determined without any adjustment comparison.
The ID of an Exit.
Efficiency of Operations.
Reliable output/related working hours; separation of the machine, front and quality of the material before assembly.
The first dissemination.
One front, multiple machines and a shift data; matching production, stop and consumption before the aggregate dashboard.
Control of production, stock, quality and stop in a operating chain.
The process and the detail of four stages.
Interactive process model
PROJECT360 / MINEThe operating program.
Stage input
Front, Shift, Capacity and Production Target
Rules of control.
Program domain and measurement unit are connected to the type of operation.
Deliverable
The operating program.
Conceptual view of the service; by selecting the same step, input, control and output.
Industry context
The corresponding system. Reality of operation.
Operational model is adjusted to the type of mining and production process: the origin and destination of the flow of the material, the measurement period, the unit, the moisture or the carat are specified in the case of application and the toxin document. the transfer event with the fresh production is not one. the stop and function of the equipment are connected to the same shift and range. the system can clarify the adjustment of the stock and consumption of the resources; the special model of the mining storage or laboratory certification does not take place and the connection to these resources requires technical examination.
Key issues
Bottlenecks to address in the design
The general solution without the recognition of these dependencies, only creates a layer of data record.
01
Combination of operations and projects.
Daily production and development plans use common resources and their mutual effects must be seen.
02
Dependency from the machinery.
Prepared for work, stop, repair and productivity of the fleet directly affects the plan and cost.
03
The great dealers.
The amount of collection, transportation, cancellation and payment requires joint and documented control.
Plan of process.
Covering core project and operational lifecycles
1
Preparation
Design, Access and Infrastructure
2
The extraction
Explosion, burning and transportation.
3
Processing
Equipment, installation and installation.
4
development
Increased capacity and improved performance.
The Domain.
Proposed modules & capabilities
The final domain is determined on the basis of business model, contracts, available data and management priorities.
1
Exploitation and transportation.
Registration of the program and real competition, route, shift, contractor and operational range.
2
Machines and stops.
Prepared for work, damage, repair, working hours and fuel consumption.
3
Control of contractors.
Sums, rates, status, commitments and performance assessment.
4
Development plans.
Engineering, buying, building and launching factory and mining infrastructure.
5
resources and costs.
Budget, actual cost, non-hour, fuel and final cost forecast.
6
DASHWORD Production and Project
Integrated view of operational objectives, development progress, barriers and decisions.
The Management Control Room.
KPIs built from operational data
Each indicator has a definition, source, owner and updating period and has traceability from report to base record.
Implementation of the Programme.Ready for the fleet.The benefit of transportation.The cost of the operation.Progress of development plan.The contractor’s work
PROJECT 360Mining & mineral processing
Examples of control structure; real data is defined in the organization system.
01Implementation of the Programme.Source · owner · date of status
02Ready for the fleet.Source · owner · date of status
03The benefit of transportation.Source · owner · date of status
04The cost of the operation.Source · owner · date of status
The exit management.Who is responsible, who is responsible, who is responsible?
A real issue, a clear path.
From equipment downtime to production-capacity impact
Scenario of Explanation.
In mining and processing, the capacity of a section depends on the availability of equipment, food, repairs and the next section’s limitation. Independent report of each unit may hide the whole chain’s threshold. The system must relate the stop event to the program, resources and performance of the process.
01 - Identification
A sign that should not be lost.
Production declined, but the duration and reason for the stop of the equipment with performance report is not the same.
02 – Analysis
Connecting the data base.
Equipment, shift, cause of stop and repair schedule are registered with common rules. Separation of scheduled stop, failure and process limitation prevents wrong conclusion.
03 – Action
Responsible and timely.
The chain manager sees which limitation has the most impact on the usable capacity. repair action, supply of a piece or program change is connected to the same event and its effect is controlled in the subsequent period.
What is followed.Office stops with reason and time break.Repair and functioning.Capacity bottleneck report
Acceptance criteria
from a attractive. to a reliable output.
Time of interruption should not be reassembled. the definition of reference capacity, active shift and measurement unit should be the same before comparing courses.
Output of cooperation.
Usable deliverables, beyond software
In addition to the system, data model, circulation rules, index identity and operating documents are delivered to the organization.
Operations and Project Information Model.Form of operation.The car machine.Register of Contractor.Report of development.
From analysis to collaboration.
The first publication must to solve a specific problem.
The small and testable range allows the possibility to check the rules with real users. system expansion is done after the data model and pilot circulation are confirmed.
Pilot focuses on a limited chain from front to food processing unit. Principle, destination, quantity and shift are standardized to see the balance and cause of the difference.
Errors to be controlled in design.
Combined with different boundaries.
Food, internal transfer, and product are three different concepts. the measurement and inter-period stock limits must be clear so that the report does not turn into a combination of multiple uneven numbers.
Key Relationships in the Information Model
← Furniture ← Storage ← Food ← Products
Examples of admission.
Balance differences of a period with the source of measurement, transfer and stock change can be explained.
Specialized Questions
Common Questions About Mining and Mining Industry
The final architecture is stabilized after examining processes, roles, data and organizational limitations.
Does the system also work for the mining operation?+
The performance of shift, competition, fleet and contractor can be managed alongside development plans.
How is the machine stop recorded?+
The type of stop, time, cause, responsibility, action and its impact on the production or project is registered and analyzed in the work-ready index.
Is the construction project of the processing factory covered?+
Yes. engineering, supply, construction, cost control and launch modules are configured for the processing factory.
How is the data of the contractors controlled?+
The amount registered, confirmed and paid is linked to the scope, period and line of the contract.